Op-Ed: Under UN guidelines Jews are indigenous to Israel, Palestinians are not

 

Those who argue “for Palestinian ‘indigenous rights’ are usually those who have little grasp of the history, and no understanding of the truth behind indigenous rights.”

By Ryan Bellerose

 

I am a Métis from Paddle Prairie Metis settlement. My father, Mervin Bellerose, co-authored the Métis Settlements Act of 1989, which was passed by the Alberta legislature in 1990 and cemented our land rights. I founded Canadians For Accountability, a native rights advocacy group, and I am an organizer and participant in the Idle No More movement in Calgary. And I am a Zionist.

Magdala stone with Menorah that was found in the Archaeological site inside the Migdal Synagogue area – Photo: Hanay

Indigenous status

To begin, let us acknowledge that there is no rule that a land can have only one indigenous people; it is not a zero sum game in which one group must be considered indigenous so that therefore another is not.

However, there is a very clear guideline to being an indigenous people. It is somewhat complex but can be boiled down to the checklist below, as developed by anthropologist José R. Martínez-Cobo (former special rapporteur of the Sub-commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities for the United Nations).

This list was developed because indigenous rights are beginning to be respected across the planet. This recognition is incredibly important, so we as indigenous people cannot allow non-indigenous people to make false claims, which ultimately would harm our own rights.


The creation and declaration of the sovereign nation of Israel marks the first time in history that an indigenous people has managed to regain control of its ancestral lands and build a nation state.

Israel is the world’s first modern indigenous state: the creation and declaration of the sovereign nation of Israel marks the first time in history that an indigenous people has managed to regain control of its ancestral lands and build a nation state. As such, this is incredibly important for indigenous people both to recognize and to support as a great example for our peoples to emulate.

The actual working definition of “indigenous people,” (not the Wikipedia version, nor Merriam Webster, both more suited to plants and animals) for purposes of this essay is that developed by aforementioned anthropologist José R. Martínez-Cobo. With this as my foundation, I will detail why Jews are indigenous to indIsrael, and why Palestinians are not.

Martinez-Cobo’s research suggests that indigenous communities, peoples and nations are those which, having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of the societies now prevailing on those territories, or parts of them. They form at present non-dominant sectors of society, excepting Israel as noted above, and are determined to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity, as the basis of their continued existence as peoples, in accordance with their own cultural patterns, social institutions and legal system.

This historical continuity may consist of the continuation, for an extended period reaching into the present of one or more of the following factors:

  • Occupation of ancestral lands, or at least of part of them
  • Common ancestry with the original occupants of these lands
  • Culture in general, or in specific manifestations (such as religion, living under a tribal system, membership of an indigenous community, dress, means of livelihood, lifestyle, etc.)
  • Language (whether used as the only language, as mother-tongue, as the habitual means of communication at home or in the family, or as the main, preferred, habitual, general or normal language)
  • Residence in certain parts of the country, or in certain regions of the world
  • Religion that places importance on spiritual ties to the ancestral lands
  • Blood quantum – that is, the amount of blood you carry of a specific people to identify as that people. The concept was developed by colonialists in order to eventually breed out native peoples.

Close up of relief on the Arch of Titus in Rome showing spoils brought to Rome after their Siege of Jerusalem

  • Their lands were occupied, first by the Romans in the first century, then by the Arabs in the seventh century.
  • They share common ancestry with previous occupants as determined by several genetic studies.
  • Their culture can be traced directly to the Levant, where it developed into what is now known as “Jewish culture.” While different Jewish communities have slightly different traditions, they all share the same root culture, and it remains unchanged. They have resurrected their traditional language, and while many still speak Yiddish and Ladino, Hebrew has become the primary language again.
  • They have spiritual ties to the land, which plays a large role in their traditions as a people.

Despite all the arguments about “European” Jews, they in fact meet all the criteria set forth by Martínez-Cobo. Even though Israel is the first modern indigenous state, it still has lands that are occupied by foreigners in Judea and Samaria. Those are ancestral lands and, many feel that they should be returned to the indigenous peoples for self-determination.

Now, for the flip side.

Palestinians have what are called “rights of longstanding presence;” and although these are legitimate rights, they do not trump indigenous rights. The very nature of “longstanding presence” means that although they lived somewhere a long time, they do not have the right to occupy indigenous peoples and control them.

The argument that Palestinians are indigenous is incorrect for several reasons.

  • Approximately 50% percent of Palestinian Arabs can track their ancestors back farther than their great-grandparents. Many are descended from Arabs brought to the Levant by the British to build infrastructure after World War I.
  • The vast majority of Palestinians are Arabic speaking Muslims; the Arabic language is indigenous to the Arabian Peninsula, as is the Muslim religion. The Muslim religion’s holiest places are not in the Levant, but in the city of Mecca, located in the Arabian Peninsula. They have no specifically Palestinian culture that is completely Palestinian dating before the 1960s; in fact, prior to that, the majority identified as “greater Syrians.”
  • Some Palestinians share common ancestry with indigenous peoples, but they neither follow indigenous traditions nor do they self-identify as those indigenous peoples. They share neither religion nor language with them. Blood quantum alone is insufficient to transmit indigenous status.
  • The Arabs of the Middle East subsumed several indigenous populations, but no group can become indigenous through subsuming indigenous peoples. Rather, they conquered the entire region and spread their own language, customs, and religion. This is historical fact.

Now you might ask, why is this important? It is important to indigenous people because we cannot allow the argument that conquerors can become indigenous. If we, as other indigenous people, allow that argument to be made, then we are delegitimising our own rights.

If conquerors can become indigenous, then the white Europeans who came to my indigenous lands in North America could now claim to be indigenous. The white Europeans who went to Australia and New Zealand could now claim to be indigenous. If we, even once, allow that argument to be made, indigenous rights are suddenly devalued and meaningless. This is somewhat peculiar, as those who are arguing for Palestinian “indigenous rights” are usually those who have little grasp of the history, and no understanding of the truth behind indigenous rights.

If you should encounter the argument that conquerors may themselves become indigenous to a region by virtue of conquering, direct those who assert the argument to this article, and help them understand not only is the argument wrong – it is dangerous to Indigenous people everywhere.

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Ryan Bellerose

Ryan Bellerose, a Zionist, is Metis from the Paddle Prairie Metis settlement in Northern Alberta, Canada. He founded Canadians For Accountability, a native rights advocacy group, and is an organizer and participant in the Idle No More movement in Calgary as well as a founding member of an Israeli advocacy group called Calgary United with Israel.

Follow Ryan Bellerose on Twitter @Fenris6

 

View original Arutz Sheva publication at:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18177#.VoobvRV966o

 

 

Liked this post? well,app_10_511201348925160_377921524
One click, and you can download our App

 

Logo from site

7 comments

  1. Mickey Davis says:

    See above

  2. Mike Seth says:

    Hi Ryan,

    This observation is further reinforced by a comparative analysis of Lausanne Mandate instruments. In each and every League of Nations Mandate, certain groups were designated to be the eventual legal heir of the territory they concerned, as “people not as of yet able” to operate their own state. The necessity of such designations was implied in the nature of those Mandates, whose ultimate purpose was the facilitation of nationhood for the peoples inhabiting the territories, even if the delineating borders between Mandate areas were drawn essentially at random and without regard to indigenous interests and intricacies. This was also the case with British Mandate for Palestine: it utters not a word about Palestinians or even Arabs, stating explicitly that it’s purpose is the facilitation of “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”. Arabs were referred to as “existing minorities” for whom no such special guidance was intended, as was the natural conclusion of the explicitly pronounced viewpoint that the Jewish people are the indigenous people of Eretz Israel. Insofar as it is popular these days to regard this arrangement as somehow unfair, the fact remains that it is well founded historically, justified morally and was and still is lawful.

  3. It’s always the same story: Whenever Israel is investigated thoroughly, and in an open and unbiased atmosphere, Israel always comes out being right about it’s history and its rights.

    It’s just too bad, Jew-haters and those who back Palestinian terrorists, support the lies of the BDS movement, and the Apartheid Israel week at universities throughout Europe, Australia and the US.

  4. Judith Levine says:

    Ryan Bellerose is a Zionist. He is also a meticulous researcher who never makes claims he can not back up with fact. Because of this he and his father regained many rights for their people and for their lands. We are very grateful that he lends his many talents and abilities to the support of Israel, Israelis, and Jews everywhere. And like so many others, I am very proud to be able to call him a friend.

  5. raz khan says:

    O Children of Israel, why did you not learn from the nazi holocaust and murder of millions of your people ? Why did you not become a beacon of hope to the nations and to all those people facing discrimination, torture and racist ethnic cleansing ? Why have you the zionists become what you most hated ? Why have you, the israeli racists become the zionist nazi and why have you made the palestinian people the jews being led to the gas chambers ? Why have you turned from being the oppressed to being the oppressor ? Have you forgotten what it is like to be innocent and be oppressed in your own land, that you so freely deal out murder without a shadow of remorse or compassion ? O ye children of Yahwe, Elohim the one true God of all humanity give peace to your brethren the children of Ishmael the first born son of Abraham on whom God promised 12 princes and a great nation, before it is too late, as you suffered God’s punishment at the hands of the Nazies, and the Europeans why do you punish the people who had nothing to do with it ? When you fleed persecution and ghetto’s from Europe over a thousand years, the muslims received you with open arms and treated you as brothers, why did you turn against those who befriended you and gave you shelter in your time of need ? The muslims never made you live in ghetto’s, they did not murder you in progroms like the russians and europeans, when will you open your eyes and give the palestinians there homeland back that they and their ancestors have lived in for over a thousand years ? The muslims did not kick out the jews in the diaspora, it was the romans, the arabs in palastine have the blood and genes of canaanites in them, as you said yourself Ryan, this may not give them the rights you say, but in my eyes and the worlds, this gives them more rights than the jews, the canaanites were the first indigenous people of that land until they were conquered by the semitic tribe of Moses, their blood was not completely exterminated by moses and his people as it says in the old testament, the conquerors always re-write history infavour of themselves, the blood and genes of canaan is still thriving today as is written in the new testament that there were thousands of them living there in the time of jesus, what can you say to those facts ryan ?

    • BGOLson says:

      Why do you, the Arabs, always appear on Jewish websites and spout your incessant bile? If you don’t like us, stay the hell off websites where we’re likely to be. I don’t go on Al Jazeera and spew hatred and idiotic nonsense.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.