Solar system may have evolved faster than thought

Scientists say solar system came into being 4.5 billion years after Big Bang, but formation took shorter time.

 

The vast solar system that contains Earth is not older than scientists had thought, but it apparently developed faster than they surmised, according to an international team of researchers from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and universities and laboratories in the US and Japan.

The astronomical team, who published their findings in a recent issue of the prestigious journal Science, said that the solar system indeed came into being some 4.5 billion years after the Big Bang, but its formation took a shorter time than researchers had thought.

NASA’s ‘Eyes on the Solar System’ Web app – Photo: YouTube screenshot

Establishing chronologies of past events or determining ages of objects need clocks that tick at different paces, according to how far back one looks. Nuclear clocks, which are used for such dating, are based on the rate of decay of an atomic nucleus expressed by a half-life – the time it takes for half of a number of nuclei to decay. Each nuclear species has its own half-life.

Radiocarbon dating, which was invented in Chicago more than six decades ago and has been refined ever since, can determine when artifacts even from prehistoric times originated because the half-life of radiocarbon (carbon-14) is a few thousand years. The evaluation of ages of the history of earth or of the solar system requires extremely “slow-paced” chronometers consisting of nuclear clocks with much longer half-lives.

HU nuclear physicist Prof. Michael Paul, as well as researchers from the University of Notre Dame and the Argonne National Laboratory in the US and two Japanese universities, conducted the research.

The main tool for establishing the time evolution of the solar system over its first few hundred million years is called 146Sm, which belongs to a family of nuclear species that were “alive” in our sun and its solar system when they were “born.”

Events that occurred later, within a few hundred million years, are dated by the amount of 146Sm that was left in various mineral archives until its eventual “extinction.”

This by itself is due to a delicate geochemical property of samarium, a rare element in nature. It is a sensitive probe for the separation, or differentiation, of the silicate portion of Earth and of other planetary bodies.

The main result of the team’s work is a new determination of the half-life of 146Sm, which was previously recognized as 103 million years, to a much shorter value of 68 million years.

The shorter half-life value, like a clock ticking faster, has the effect of shrinking the assessed chronology of events in the early solar system and in planetary differentiation into a shorter time span.

The new time scale is now consistent with recent and precise dating made on a lunar rock and is in better agreement with the dating obtained with other chronometers. The measurement of the tool’s half-life, performed over several years by the collaborators, involved the use of the ATLAS particle accelerator at the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois.

 

View Source
By JUDY SIEGEL

One comment

  1. telson says:

    As regards the birth of the solar system and the Earth, the most common theory is that in the beginning, there was only one rotating cloud of gas and dust from which the Sun and planets gradually began to form.
    As this cloud rotated at a great velocity, only its central part stayed in place, and from it the Sun was formed; through collisions and mergers, the separate parts began to form into larger pieces until, finally, they became planets. It is believed that the whole solar system and the Earth came into existence from this one gas-dust cloud.

    When we start to study the possibility that the solar system and the Earth came into being in the way described above, we must note that there are many problems with the theory. This suggests that the theory of their birth cannot rest on a firm foundation.

    Even nowadays, when astrophysics has progressed enormously, many theories concerning the origin of the solar system are unsatisfactory. Scientists still disagree about the details. There is no commonly accepted theory in sight.

    The whole article; http://www.jariiivanainen.net/beginning4.html.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply