Seeking to salvage his reputation as a supporter of Israel, former POTUS Obama addressed a New York synagogue where he defended his decision that the US not veto the infamous UN Security Council anti-Israel resolution, because of the ‘Skyrocketed’ pace of Jewish construction, saying, ‘To be a true friend of Israel it is important to be honest.’

By Ynet

Former US president Barack Obama attributed his decision to allow a UN Security Resolution against Israeli settlements to pass shortly before leaving office in 2016 to the “skyrocketed” pace of construction that would have made the establishment of a Palestinian state impossible.Addressing the New York synagogue congregation of Temple Emanu-El last week, the former president sought to defend his decision that to instruct his Israel Ambassador Samantha Power not to veto the contentious resolution 2334 calling for an end to settlement construction while simultaneously declaring them illegal.

“Yesterday, in complete contradiction of this commitment—including specific commitment made by President Obama himself in 2011—the Obama administration carried out a disgraceful anti-Israeli underhanded move at the UN.”

Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu

The decision, which enabled the resolution to smoothly pass in the Security with a unanimous vote, sparked outrage in Israel and triggered a rift between Jerusalem and Washington.

RELATED:

• US Justice Dept opens investigation on Obama-Hezbollah money laundering scheme
• Trump’s Jerusalem decision counters Obama’s spiteful UNSC vote that changed American policy
• REVEALED: How Obama’s administration covertly supported Hamas against Israel

“The pace of settlement construction skyrocketed making it almost impossible to make any kind of Palestinian state,” the former president was quoted as saying in the Mail Online.

‘Voting against the resolution would have damaged our credibility on affirming human rights only when it’s convenient not when it has to do with ourselves and our friends,’ Obama said.

Contrary to accusations that Obama’s actions had caused a significant deterioration in the US-Israel relationship, he implied that his decision was in fact reflective of the strong bonds.

US Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power speaks to the UN Security Council after changing U.S. policy by abstaining from UN Security Council Resolution 2334 , December 23, 2016 – UN video screenshot

‘To be a true friend of Israel it is important to be honest about it, and the politics of this country sometimes do not allow for it,’ Obama said.In a bid to salvage his reputation as a staunch Israel supporter, Obama pointed to the September 2016 signing of a $38 billion aid package for Israel, the largest ever provided by any US administration to any country.

‘It is not a subject for dispute,’ Obama said, adding that he and and his staff would often joke that he was “basically a liberal Jew.”

But despite his public position as an unwavering supporter of Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed his administration at the time, arguing that it constituted a flagrant attempt to dictate final-status terms in the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

PM Netanyahu – Photo: PMO, Facebook

“All of the US presidents after Carter met the American commitment not to try and dictate to Israel at the Security Council conditions for a final-status agreement,” an enraged Netanyahu said at the time, before voicing unprecedented scorn for the Obama administration.

“And yesterday, in complete contradiction of this commitment—including specific commitment made by President Obama himself in 2011—the Obama administration carried out a disgraceful anti-Israeli underhanded move at the UN.”

View original Ynet publication at:
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5076590,00.html