Netanyahu to ambassadors: Iran hasn’t yet crossed nuclear red line

The Prime Minister meets envoys and warns Hamas could take control of the Palestinian Authority “any day.”



Iran has not yet crossed the red line that Israel set on its nuclear program, and Israel remains determined to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said Thursday.

NetanyahuNetanyahu was speaking at the last session of the annual year-end meeting in the foreign ministry for Israel’s ambassadors abroad.

During a speech at the UN in September, Netanyahu drew a red line on a picture of a bomb signifying when Tehran would be 90% on the way to development of a bomb, meaning before it had acquired enough enriched uranium to build a nuclear detonator if it so decided. He said that Iran would not likely pass that line until the spring or summer.

“Iran remains the number one threat,” Netanyahu said, adding that there was a chance for positive change if Iran was prevented from getting a nuclear weapon.

Netanyahu said in the short term he expected the regional tribulations to continue.

Netanyahu was accompanied to the meeting by his national security advisor, Yaakov Amidror, who chastised the envoys when he addressed them earlier this week for asking critical questions of Israel’s decision to announce construction plans beyond the Green Line in response to the Palestinians’ successful upgrade bid at the UN in November. Amidror said that the envoys could either faithfully represent the government’s decisions, or resign.

Ministry officials said that the incident did not come up during the meeting with Netanyahu, though the prime minister did address the issue of E1, saying that what was stopping any progress along the diplomatic front with the Palestinians was not an announcement of planning for E1, but rather the Palestinian refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state within any borders.

Netanyahu warned that Hamas could take control “any day” of the Palestinian Authority , and therefore “concrete security arrangements” needed to be included in any agreement, as well as a  recognition of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people, an end to the  “right of return” claim,  and an honest declaration of an end-of-conflict declaration.

Netanyahu cited an editorial in The Washington Post on Wednesday to support his assertion that the E1 announcement was not the barrier to progress on the diplomatic front.

That editorial,  headlined “Overheated rhetoric on Israeli settlements,” argued that the criticism of the “flurry of announcements of new construction in Jewish settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank” was counterproductive “because it reinforces two mistaken but widely held notions: that the settlements are the principal obstacle to a deal and that further construction will make a Palestinian state impossible.”

The editorial noted that Netanyahu had limited building to areas that both sides expect Israel to eventually annex as part of a final agreement, and that the government announcement of planning on E1 was “hardly the ‘almost fatal blow’ to a two state solution” that critics have claimed.

In addition to Netanyahu, the envoys also heard on Thursday from Shin Bet head Yoram Cohen, who briefed them on the country’ security situation and said that he did not believe Israel was on the brink of a third intifada.


View original Jerusalem Post publication at: