Pamela Geller: ‘To Not Offend Savages, We’re Giving Up Our Freedoms’

WATCH: After the Texas attack, anti-Islamist activist Pamela Geller speaks out, slamming ‘media elites’ for denigrating those who offend Islam.

By Ari Soffer


Pamela Geller, the outspoken head of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, has spoken out after her group’s Mohammed Cartoon event was targeted in a shooting attack by Muslim terrorists on Sunday night.

Pamela Geller – Reuters

In an interview with CNN, Geller lashed out at the media “elites” for criticizing her group – the attackers’ intended victims – as opposed to radical Islamists responsible for such violent attacks.

The event had offered a $10,000 award for the best cartoon depicting the founder of Islam, Mohammed, and featured a speech by Dutch MP Geert Wilders, among other prominent critics of Islam.

Depictions of Mohammed are forbidden by Islam, and many Muslim extremists have attempted to enforce those blasphemy laws globally – most notably culminating in the slaughter of the staff of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo earlier this year.

The prize was won by an ex-Muslim, Geller noted, as she responded to a grilling by her interviewer, who asked whether she realized “just how dangerous an event like this could be?”

“It’s dangerous because increasingly we are abridging our freedoms so as not to offend savages,” Geller shot back.

“The very idea that if something offends me or if I’m insulted by something, I’ll kill you, and that way I can get my way – and somehow this is OK with members of the elite media and academia – is outrageous.”


Geller insisted that the event was an attempt to push back against such attacks on freedom of expression.

“We have to have this conversation, and the fact that we have to spend upwards of $50,000 dollars in security speaks to how dangerous and how in trouble freedom of speech is in this country,” she said, before taking a direct swipe at the media itself.

“And then we have to get on these news shows and somehow we – those who are targeted, those who were going to be slaughtered – are the ones who get attacked, speaks to how morally inverted this conversation is.

“I’m not concerned with Muslims, especially peaceful Muslims. I am concerned with the 25% which support Sharia; I am concerned with the amputations and the female genital mutilation and the honor violence; I am concerned that the media whitewashes and scrubs this. I am concerned for the victims.”

Following the Charlie Hebdo attacks in particular, some western media outlets were accused of “betrayal” after self-censoring in order not to “offend” Muslims, by refusing to show the front cover of the paper’s post-massacre issue, which featured a picture of Mohammed.


Speech Geert Wilders at Muhammad Cartoon Contest, Texas, May 3, 2015

Free speech advocates argue that by doing so media outlets are essentially granting  victory to Islamist terrorism, and betraying their raison-detre of upholding freedom of speech and expression.


View original Arutz Sheva publication at:

One comment

  1. Francois says:

    Many people say Pam Geller went too far. Even Donald Trump. But the world has been pressured to shut up in fear of Muslim jihadists. We do not have to push back in anger every time a radical provokes us, but we must assert our rights and freedoms at some point and force the hand of jihadists and require them to obey the laws of civilization. How many times have we seen and heard of radicals defaming Jews, Christians and their God in the vilest manner? Did the prophet Elijah back down and tremble at the blasphemy of the prophets of Baal? No. He was defiant and sarcastic in the face of their god. There are times when we should not fear to laugh at a false prophet. We must maintain human rights, even for those who do not appreciate and respect them.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.