In an exceptionally sharp critique published on Monday, Wall Street Journal foreign affairs columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner Bret Stephens ripped apart U.S. President Barack Obama’s foreign policy.

George Orwell – Photo: AP

The op-ed, titled “The Orwellian Obama Presidency,” detailed the flaws of Obama’s approach to foreign affairs. “To adapt George Orwell’s motto for Oceania: Under Mr. Obama, friends are enemies, denial is wisdom, capitulation is victory,” Stephens wrote.

“There is an upside-down quality to this president’s world view. His administration is now on better terms with Iran — whose Houthi proxies, with the slogan ‘God is great, death to America, death to Israel, damn the Jews, power to Islam,’ just deposed Yemen’s legitimate president — than it is with Israel. He claims we are winning the war against Islamic State even as the group continues to extend its reach into Libya, Yemen and Nigeria.

“He treats Republicans in the Senate as an enemy when it comes to the Iranian nuclear negotiations, while treating the Russian foreign ministry as a diplomatic partner. He favors the moral legitimacy of the United Nations Security Council to that of the U.S. Congress. He is facilitating Bashar Assad’s war on his own people by targeting ISIS so the Syrian dictator can train his fire on our ostensible allies in the Free Syrian Army.

“He was prepared to embrace a Muslim Brother as president of Egypt but maintains an arm’s-length relationship with his popular pro-American successor. He has no problem keeping company with Al Sharpton and tagging an American police department as comprehensively racist but is nothing if not adamant that the words ‘Islamic’ and ‘terrorism’ must on no account ever be conjoined. The deeper that Russian forces advance into Ukraine, the more they violate cease-fires, the weaker the Kiev government becomes, the more insistent he is that his response to Russia is working.”

Stephens then delved into Obama’s ire for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “The current victim of Mr. Obama’s moral inversions is the recently re-elected Israeli prime minister. Normally a sweeping democratic mandate reflects legitimacy, but not for Mr. Obama. Now we are treated to the astonishing spectacle in which Benjamin Netanyahu has become persona non grata for his comments doubting the current feasibility of a two-state solution. This, while his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas is in the 11th year of his four-year term, without a murmur of protest from the White House.

“It is true that Mr. Netanyahu made an ugly election-day remark about Israeli-Arab voters ‘coming out in droves to the polls,’ thereby putting ‘the right-wing government in danger.’ For this he has apologized, in person, to leaders of the Israeli-Arab community.

“That’s more than can be said for Mr. Abbas, who last year threatened Israel with a global religious war if Jews were allowed to pray in the Temple Mount’s Al Aqsa mosque. ‘We will not allow our holy places to be contaminated,’ the Palestinian Authority president said. The Obama administration insists that Mr. Abbas is ‘the best interlocutor Israel is ever going to have.’

“Maybe that’s true, but if so it only underscores the point Mr. Netanyahu was making in the first place — and for which Mr. Obama now threatens a fundamental reassessment of U.S. relations with Israel. In 2014 Mr. Abbas agreed to a power-sharing agreement with Hamas, a deal breaker for any Israeli interested in peace. In 2010 he used the expiration of a 10-month Israeli settlement freeze as an excuse to abandon bilateral peace efforts. In 2008 he walked away from a statehood offer from then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. In 2000 he was with Yasser Arafat at Camp David when the Palestinians turned down a deal from Israel’s Ehud Barak.

“And so on. For continuously rejecting good-faith Israeli offers, Mr. Abbas may be about to get his wish: a U.S. vote for Palestinian statehood at the United Nations. For tiring of constant Palestinian bad faith — and noting the fact — Israel will now be treated to pariah-nation status by Mr. Obama.“

Stephens advised the Israeli government to “repay contempt with contempt.”

“Mr. Obama plays to classic bully type,” Stephens wrote. “He is abusive and surly only toward those he feels are either too weak, or too polite, to hit back.”

Regarding Obama’s remaining time in office, Stephens wrote, “The Israelis will need to chart their own path of resistance. On the Iranian nuclear deal, they may have to go rogue: Let’s hope their warnings have not been mere bluffs. Israel survived its first 19 years without meaningful U.S. patronage. For now, all it has to do is get through the next 22, admittedly long, months.”

View original Israel Hayom publication at: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=24401