US harshly condemns Israel for adding settlement homes in West Bank

 

In an unusually strong statement, the White House & US State Department called plans to construct a ‘significant’ new settlement of up to 300 housing units in the West Bank ‘deeply troubling’ and undermines the peace process.
– The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs commented in reply, “The 98 housing units approved in Shilo do not constitute a ‘new settlement.'”

The Associated Press, Reuters

 

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is once again condemning Israel for plans to construct housing on land claimed by the Palestinians, saying that a new project announced last week profoundly hurts efforts to forge a two-state solution to the long-running conflict.

netanyahu-obama-screenshot

In unusually strong statements, the White House and State Department lashed out at a proposal announced last week to construct a significant new settlement of up to 300 housing units and establish an industrial zone in the West Bank.

“Proceeding with this new settlement is another step towards cementing a one-state reality of perpetual occupation that is fundamentally inconsistent with Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state,” spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement. “Such moves will only draw condemnation from the international community, distance Israel from many of its partners, and further call into question Israel’s commitment to achieving a negotiated peace.”

Toner said the proposal was “deeply troubling” because Israel announced the proposal so soon after the US agreed last month to a new 10-year, $38 billion military aid package for Israel. He also said it was “disheartening” as the announcement came the world was mourning the death of former Israeli President and Prime Minister Shimon Peres. US officials said the administration was particularly disturbed because the announcement came as President Barack Obama was visiting Jerusalem last week for the Peres’ state funeral.

“It is deeply troubling, in the wake of Israel and the US concluding an unprecedented agreement on military assistance designed to further strengthen Israel’s security, that Israel would take a decision so contrary to its long term security interest in a peaceful resolution of its conflict with the Palestinians,” he said.

“Furthermore, it is disheartening that while Israel and the world mourned the passing of President Shimon Peres, and leaders from the US and other nations prepared to honor one of the great champions of peace, plans were advanced that would seriously undermine the prospects for the two-state solution that he so passionately supported.”Later in the day, the White House sharply criticized Israel on Wednesday over its plan for a new settlement building in the West Bank that the White House says undermines the peace process and contradicts assurances from Jerusalem.

We did receive public assurances from the Israeli government that contradict this announcement,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said at a news briefing. “I guess when we’re talking about how good friends treat one another, that’s a source of serious concern as well.”

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs commented in reply, “The 98 housing units approved in Shilo do not constitute a ‘new settlement.’ This housing will be built on state land in the existing settlement of Shilo and will not change its municipal boundary or geographic footprint. The units are intended to provide a housing solution for the residents of Amona who must leave their homes in accordance with the demolition order issued by Israel’s High Court of Justice.

“Israel remains committed to a solution of two states for two peoples, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the Jewish state of Israel. The real obstacle to peace is not the settlements—a final status issue that can and must be resolved in negotiations between the parties—but the persistent Palestinian rejection of a Jewish state in any boundaries.”

The US, which has repeatedly criticized Israel for such projects, has refrained from imposing consequences for the actions.

On Tuesday, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also condemned the plans for the construction near Shiloh, west of Ramallah.

 

View original Ynet publication at:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4863254,00.html

 

 

 

 

Liked this post? well,app_10_511201348925160_377921524
One click, and you can download our free App

Logo from site

2 comments

  1. Michael D Perloff says:

    So the white house and state department have a problem with Jews building homes in Judea. What’s their position on the hundreds of Arab settlements built on land over which they never either owned nor had sovereignty during the 19 years of illegal occupation by foreign Arab armies before it was liberated in 1967?

    • Phillip Pasmanick says:

      I know that’s a rhetorical question because it’s a universal truth that in any situation, there’s a double-standard in regard to Israel.
      For example:
      1) Home construction
      2) Defending its borders against rocket attacks
      3) ‘Collateral damage’ during armed conflicts
      4) Deporting illegal migrants
      5) Security Fence
      6) Boycotting Israeli goods
      7) ‘War Crime’ accusations

      There are more… like targeted assassinations (bin Laden), drone strikes (mistakes) invasions (Falkland Islands, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc) that are all accepted by the world, but G-d forbid Israel do something similar in its defense!

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply